According to imdb, I have to date seen 3 Milan Luthria films. Ok, 4 actually, but I really would rather forget I ever wasted 2 hours of my life to watch Hattrick. So those 3 are: Taxi 9 2 11, Once Upon a Time in Mumbaai and The Dirty Picture. And at the end of all three I felt like saying Romeo's line: "Oh wilt thou leave me so unsatisfied??". Luthria is a charming storyteller, but it's a crying shame that he can't make up his mind about what he wants to say with his films. Every time I see one I am left with the lingering question: Why did he make this movie? It's a good movie, sure, but... why?
After finishing Taxi 9 2 11 yesterday I commented that it's like a parable, it exists in a surreal world where the characters just... are, without having to justify why they are. You are told about them, and you just accept that they have their own internal logic and their own compulsions that well... you may not necessarily understand. But all will be explained when you get to the moral of the story (which is why I quite liked the ending, surreal as it may be).
Thinking of these other two movies (OUATIM and TDP), I think they also work well as parables. They talk of rises and falls, of right and wrong, of success and failure, and admittedly, they do so in a rather intelligent way. They're like a smart retelling of those children-stories you used to read years ago, with witty princes and fearsome ogres whose existence or raison d'etre you never questioned. You just went with it because that's what the story told you to. But unlike in fairy-tales, with Luthria there is no moral to the story in the end. There is no good to triumph over evil, there is no ogre to be slaughtered, there is no princess whose hand can be won. It's the same style of storytelling that parables use, but just when you get to the end and you're waiting for the punchline, for those last 2 lines that give you the life lesson to be learned, you get cut off.
The Dirty Picture is, admittedly or not, a biopic of the life and times of the South Indian sex-symbol of the 80s, Silk Smitha. Without knowing too much about her life, or having seen any of her films, I can still completely understand why she was a controversial actress. The Dirty Picture does well with showcasing that, and just in case you're slower on the uptake, they even put it into words for you, one of Naseeruddin Shah's best lines in the film: "You're our late night fantasy... that no one wants to talk about in the morning." This goddess of sex that everyone wants a piece of cannot be accepted as part of a society who thinks of itself as virtuous and wholesome.
But after having made this point, The Dirty Picture somehow chickens out when the time comes to hit you with the punchline. If the movie was to be a slap in the face of a public who cannot resolve the cognitive dissonance created by what it really wants and what is proper, then Silk should have triumphed in the end. If on the other hand it wanted to be a commentary on the genesis of a star and its inevitable downfall, then Silk didn't need to be Silk, it could have been any other star, the controversy didn't add anything to the story. As it stands, with its two feet in two different boats, The Dirty Picture leaves you with the truly dirty feeling that, when it's all said and done, this society which gets criticized in the beginning for not owning up to their lechery, is the one and only winner in this film. And as I was saying earlier, that makes me wonder: why tell this story to begin with?
Sure Vidya Balan is absolutely fabulous and truly the queen of our fantasies, whether those fantasies revolve around her generous cleavage or around the belief that a woman can be considered a sex-symbol even without spending grueling hours in the gym every week (I suspect a lot of women watching this will come out with this particular fantasy, as did I). And yes, Nasseruddin Shah is an absolute delight to watch as he lusts, smoulders, boils over and drools over... well, himself really (as much as Silk would like to think it's over her).
It also goes without saying that Ooh La La is a true feast for the eyes on the big screen, even though quite honestly the best version of the song is Tusshar's rendition of it in his bedroom. And I quite enjoy Emraan Hashmi when he's being emo and brooding, even if I will never understand why he just has to sing to at least one song in all of his films whether the film warrants it or not (and whether it's a pretty song or not).
And there's no denying that it's a very well made movie. But while leaving the theatre one can't help but think that despite the clever one-liners and the million bite-size life teachings that make up its script (sometimes in very entertaining ways), the Dirty Picture was robbed of its punchline. And if there IS a moral to the story, it's sadly the same old and boring one: that no matter how high we rise, our existence is meaningless if we don't have the only thing that matters: love.
You know, sometimes I think Bollywood is still terribly nostalgic of itself. In the past month I have seen 2 movies (Rockstar and The Dirty Picture) with a very similar trajectory: the rise and fall of a star who turns out to be nothing without love. I said that The Dirty Picture was a parable without a moral. But if Bollywood itself were to be seen as a story, its moral would be this line from an old song: Ishq bina kya jeena, yaara? (What's the point in living if there is no love?).
Which I find somewhat amusing given that Bollywood has been fighting against its old school love stories for almost a decade now. From making movies like I Hate Luv Storys, to reciting and mocking old love story dialogues in pretty much every other movie, to making a Rockstar and a Dirty Picture, it's like Bollywood can't make up its mind between embracing its love for love or letting go of it. Now don't get me wrong, I adore Rockstar with the burning power of a thousand suns, but sometimes I do think Bollywood is like a teenager, who can see nothing beyond that world of love that it has created for himself/herself. And just like human beings do, I wonder if Bollywood will ever grow up from its teens and realize that there are so many other things worth talking about in life other than love? It's not that I don't think it can move mountains, or that it's the most delightful anchor in one's existence, but let's admit it once and for all that it's not the be all and end all of life. And then move on.
Oh well... The Dirty Picture is still very much worth a watch for Vidya's excellent performance (or for her cleavage, depending on your tastes, of course).
The Dirty Picture (2011)
Director: Milan Luthria
Starring: Vidya Balan, Nasseeruddin Shah, Emraan Hashmi, Tusshar Kapoor
Music: Vishal- Shekhar
Choreography: Pony Prakashraj
10 months ago
9 comments:
AGREED! :-)
Ahahaha! Not a woman of many words. :)
I was actually surprised that we managed to write pretty much the same thing in different places at the exact same time. Even for us, that's rare! :) <3
It takes me so much longer to use my smartphone and tweet you than it is for me to type here.
I didn't wach the movie but skimmed through your thoughts.
What you said here...I really agree - " sometimes I do think Bollywood is like a teenager, who can see nothing beyond that world of love that it has created for himself/herself. And just like human beings do, I wonder if Bollywood will ever grow up from its teens and realize that there are so many other things worth talking about in life other than love? It's not that I don't think it can move mountains, or that it's the most delightful anchor in one's existence, but let's admit it once and for all that it's not the be all and end all of life. And then move on."
That was my problem with Bollywood, in general. Do you think it's just Indian movies though? Love is in a lot of movies and genres but is how the movie shifts and makes it centers around love.
We already discussed about one film industry (not mentioning but you know which one I'm talking about) why we aren't watching as many.
I feel bad that I haven't blogged, but at least you have!
I protest this.. this.. "redesign" and as a show of protest i refuse to read ur articles!!
Funny, I like the redesign. It looks a lot cleaner and easy on the eye.
Anyway, on topic, I have yet to decide whether to see TDP or not. Having read Baradwaj Rangan's review, I have a feeling the same things that bothered him will bother me.
On Milan Luthra, perhaps you feel the characters in his films exist on their own because he's dealing with people and worlds he doesn't really understand? Taxi was a remake of a Korean film, I believe, and I am pretty confident he doesn't have any organic or visceral feel for the South Indian film industries or culture, especially from an earlier era, beyond the easy caricatures that Bollywood loves? Even OUATIM is set in an earlier era, one that Luthra may not have a feel for. I guess I need to look up his bio to figure out his age and background.
Dolce your love of Telugu/ Malayam movies combined with your fantasies of being a voluptuous sex siren suggest that you should move to South India at the soonest! A voluptuous, White woman who loves SI movies? You will be a goddess! :-D
And as for romance being the centre of Bollywood universe: it's often substituted by bromance these days. The love interests in Delhi Belly and ZNMD seemed pretty trivial to me.
Sanyogita
Hey Nicki, not that I mind the comment on the blog, certainly not, but girl, how can you not be used to a smartphone by now??? It's so easy!!! :) Come on, next time you comment here it should be from your phone. :)
And yes, that's just it about other film industries that are not from India, it's not that love is absent, it's just that not everything revolves around it and people are seen as being perfectly happy without having found their one true love. I think that's what it comes down to for me, sometimes it gets tiring to keep seeing the same search for "the one true love that will make your life worth living".. Yawn.. :)
@ Mukundh - dude, you make me laugh so much! Next time I WILL do it on purpose!!! :D ;) Chalo, don't be too mad, it'll change as soon as spring inspires me to want something more colourful.
@ MM - thank you! I like the new look as well. I was feeling like sharing the winter blues here. :D Don't mind my Tamil friend here, he loves to criticize me.
The Baradwaj review was the one that talked about all the elements that didn't reflect the times and the real Tamil cinema of the 80s, right? I read that too, but since I'm not familiar with it, it didn't really strike a chord with me. It probably will with you.
I looked into Luthria's background. He's the son of Raj Khosla, who is, according to his wiki page, from Punjab. So there, I guess it doesn't get more North Indian than this. But that said, research, and based on that, a good script can usually fill in the blanks in such situations, no?
Like I said, it's definitely NOT a bad movie, it's well made from the point of view of story-telling. It's just too bad that it didn't end up saying anything memorable other than how awesome Vidya is. :D As Temple aptly put it on Cinema Chaat: "all sizzle, no sausage". :D (I think she was talking about the men, but I will extend that to any kind of script and character meat... uh.. figuratively speaking :D).
But you know me, I always say see it for yourself, God knows not everything that bothers me will end up being noticed by everyone. :)
@ Sanyogita - That made me laugh so much this morning! And then all I have to do is slip into a pair of sequined booty shorts and go audition for whorey-gori songs, no? :D
For the bromance, you know, I'd love to agree that it happens "often", at least it would be a change (and I quite enjoyed the bromances in both films you mentioned :D), but we're still very far from seeing that *often*. For now I'd say it's a good start, we still have a loong way to go until we see characters who are considered fulfilled without having a love interest or a family to live and die for in Indian films...
Post a Comment